This is the story of the renovation of a powder room of a private residence located in Gurgaon, India; using design principles introduced by Christopher Alexander in his magnum opus — Nature of Order. I participated in a year-long course called 'Building Beauty', the design studio of which concluded with a design and construction project. The studio faculties were Christopher Andrews, Susan Ingham, Or Ettlinger and Savyasaachi, and my studio tutor was Ana Jancar. The project brief was very simple. It was to build something in the span of 10 weeks, with a group of people and for someone other than yourself.
As fate would have it, a powder room renovation project came along just at the right time and had the exact same deadline. Ms Monica Soni’s son was coming home from the States for his internship break and had a severe dust allergy, which meant the job was to be finished, including a professional cleaning within the time allotted by the studio.
Considering the small scale of the project, being something doable in the required time, we took it on. By ‘we’, I mean me, the client, and the studio team. In the rest of this article, I will be elaborating on the design process leading up to the final result of this exercise, but before we dive into that, to give a glimpse of the result, here is a before and after picture of the powder room:
This transformation was a result of a 10-week-long exercise that included sketching, model-making, and mock-ups; but one of the activities was very much willingly excluded from the process, which is considered essential in the design method usually - the making of detailed two-dimensional drawings - also known as 'drafting', for which 'AUTOCAD experts' are employed in interior and architecture firms.
The design method used in this exercise made sure that:-
a. the design was produced from a perspective that cared about the 'whole' rather than the 'parts'
b. the left brain did not take over the design process
c. the design always felt right - to the designer, to the construction team, and to the client
So, how exactly did the design process achieve that? Read on to discover...
Centres analysis
The first step of the exercise was to do a centres analysis of the existing site. This was done to determine not only the strong and weak centres in the existing configuration but also to determine the potential direction of design development in order to strengthen the weak centres or in Alexander's words – to heal the site. Centres analysis also identifies the latent centres which can be further strengthened or realised. The field of centres reveals the most harmonious and the least harmonious parts of a site, which establishes the job of a designer to some extent, with the motive being to improve the less harmonious parts of a site and increase the harmony among the centres while increasing the degree of overall wholeness.
Project language
The next step of the exercise was to interview the client and then develop a Project Language specific to the site. The Project Language is a written document describing, in words the major patterns to be realised in the project. These patterns were written in a similar way as patterns are written in the book - "A Pattern Language" by Christopher Alexander, Sara Ishikawa and Murray Silverstein - each pattern had a title and a short description. The method of arriving at a Project Language was to combine the insights gained from the centres analysis and the interview, and then to bring it down to a maximum of 6 patterns. These 6 main patterns could have sub-patterns within them forming another level of patterns but at each level, we were advised to keep the number of patterns to be around 6 as that is what can be managed by our mind in one go without memorising it. This helps in organising and executing the design process on and off sight. The Project Language could also consist of a sketch along with each pattern.
Pattern Language - Context-level patterns:
Pattern Language - Residence-level patterns:
Pattern Language - Bathroom-level patterns:
Models, Mockups and the Construction phase
After completing the centres analysis, client interview and project language, we were ready to begin our work on the real transformation of the physical form of the site. The design tools for this part were scaled models and mockups.
Going back and forth between the models and on-site mock-ups, gradually, the bathroom began to unfold step by step. At each step, it was important to ensure that the outcome felt right. A very important question – “How does it feel?” was asked around, for me, for the client and for the studio team.
Construction Phase
The Window: Sill height, divisions and colours
When we selected a specific model of a wall-mounted WC and ordered its flush tank, which was supposed to be concealed inside the masonry wall; we found that its flush pipe was too tall resulting in the sill height of the window getting increased leading to a small, prison-like window. It was a horrible result and after discussions between the studio team; we decided to break a part of the freshly made brick wall, cut the flush pipe short and bring the sill level back to the height we had mocked up. This resulted in a loss of time and cost but restored the originally mocked-up sill height; which felt correct as per the mockups.
![]() |
| Final chosen configuration |
This was followed by giving an order for making this window to a woodworker. The craftsman was very skilled and delivered in just 2 days. He applied his own thinking as well and created the window section in such a way that one can fix glass at 3 distinct positions in the section, allowing many possibilities with glass, colour and texture combinations.
Once the frame was made in timber and installed on-site; it allowed us to mock up various glass surface colours and textures…
![]() |
| Final chosen configuration |
Upon finalisation; it was felt in the studio that there was a need to introduce one more level of scale in the window. This was achieved by introducing planters and miniature dolls on the windows sill(client's ideas). I was surprised to know that these detailed miniature dolls were actually made by children of a blind school!
![]() |
| Final window |
Tiles selection
The tile selection was a challenge in itself. We had a conceptual theme of colours and geometries; now we had to select the set of tiles that worked together to bring the same feeling as was there in our model and our minds.
We made sure to select the tiles sequentially; so that we keep matching each new tile with the overall set created with the tiles selected before it. Decisions were also affected by the tiles available in the market, the delivery time of those not available and the time in our hands considering the project deadline. Here is the sequence we followed:
2. Square black border tiles for green-tiled areas( later we decided to run the same border along all walls of the bathroom)
6. Bluish-grey subway tiles for borders
Using the images of tiles selected, I made the small model again with the tiling patterns we were considering, to see if everything was working well and to decide if any last-minute changes were needed.
Looking at this model, we decided to make a few changes. I revised the tiling pattern of the green wall using two types of green tiles and finalised a weaving type pattern instead of what we were considering earlier.
Another important point that came forward with the revised model in the studio was that the 8 Central tiles on the floor needed a boundary around them. So, we developed the boundary using the same blue subway tiles we were using on the walls.
For the corners where these borders met, we had two options in front of us to choose from, and we used a Mirror of the Self Test within the studio group to finalise.
![]() |
| 1 |
![]() |
| 2 |
Colour and Ornaments
So, with the two colours - yellow and green - decided, we began exploring other colours. We explored in the small model, the use of the colour blue as a backdrop colour to complement yellow to be highlighted.
![]() |
| Image A |
![]() |
| Image B |
Final result and reflections
We finally selected an elephant-shaped pot for the corner plant, since elephants have been a symbol of royalty in India and with everything put together, took a bunch of photographs. Nakul Jain, a colleague, humbly accepted to help us with that.![]() |
| Vanity assembly for intimate reflection |
![]() |
| The joy of entering a colourful place |
![]() |
| A royal assembly |
![]() |
| Surfaces full of life and character |
![]() |
| A reflection framed within beautiful colours and patterns |
![]() |
| Majestic vanity cabinets |
![]() |
| An echo among patterns |
![]() |
| 'Three girls' carrying three lamps |
Reflections
This project introduced to me a design method that felt very natural and humane at every step. I was surprised to have effectively done this without making any detailed two-dimensional drawings or three-dimensional virtual models at all, where we, the designers, crunch hours of work in isolation from the real site and in isolation from real conversations with the client and the people involved in construction. Moreover, each of the two-dimensional drawings are made in isolation and the daunting task of cross-referencing is needed all the time. All these processes including the making of two-dimensional drawings and three-dimensional virtual models in virtual environments require hours and days and weeks of work in a virtual atmosphere and then the daunting task of reading and making sense of the drawing set by the on-site team are very de-humanizing in nature and result in a mechanistic way of decision making based on more and more logic and less and less of feeling. Perhaps the only part where feelings are present in these processes is when the principal designers come to the drawing board and sketch, or when presentations are made to clients which are limited to a meagre proportion of the total time devoted to the project. Most of the time is consumed by these mechanistic processes, which affect the outcome drastically. In the process of designing and building using models and mockups, there is a very significant aspect of constant feeling feedback which is missing in the standard design method.
I also noticed growing confidence shown by the client in the project as the days progressed. For a client, it was a new experience to see your project unfold, bit by bit on-site, in real-time with mockups and models as compared to judging a design through a computer-generated 3D render where lights, shadows and textures are all artificially created and can be deceiving. Perhaps most importantly, I noticed a very strong connection and confidence with the team involved in building the project. Usually, designers visit the site a counted number of times after releasing the blueprints, while here, I was present with the team most of the time. This encouraged many team members to put in a little extra to achieve the collective vision, especially when we improvised to even better details and solved problems on site.




































































Well done! I did my Master's degree studying his work, and worked for him in Berkleley for a few years. You made a dramatic improvement, the palce feels much more alive. My critque would be that there is a feeling of busy-ness, with perhaps too many different geometric motifs and colors at work. Each is well done in themselves, but I feel the whole suffers from too many parts. Humbly submitted for your consideration and potential growth as a designer/artist/architect ;-)
ReplyDeleteHere's a similar sized project I did (with friend Jim Givens) following similar unfolding process:
https://jamesgivensdesign.com/givens-kitchen-process/
Thank you for your comment! It's great to know that you worked with Alexander! I agree it appears a bit too busy. It had been a part of our discussions during the process. We were particularly concerned about the yellow patterns behind the mirror and on the cabinets; and were considering whether we should do it or not, or do it in a slightly different shade of purple itself. We were thinking in the studio that we might be going a bit too far. But after a discussion with the client, we decided to go ahead with it, in the full yellow glory as you see it in the final pictures, and it didn't seem odd at all to us after completion. I believe this maybe a matter of cultural acceptance and even client preference. In India, we celebrate colours, and the somewhat chaotic aspect of life. We even have a big festival of Holi dedicated to it! The result might have been different with the same site but a different client too! Thank you for your comments and thank you for sharing the kitchen project. It is such a joy to see a project unfold through mock-ups!
DeleteI did consider the cultural difference, and can definitely see how that could be at play. But I also think the fundamental properties (15 or otherwise ;-) are relevant. Not exactly disagreeing, but in my somewhat limited appreciation of South East Asian art and colour, I would still argue (in friendly way) that it has too many motifs. It appears that three of the four walls has a distinct design/motif/colour, and the floor is distinct yet again. Not sure about the ceiling. Again, overall it's a dramatic improvement and not at all unpleasant, I'm just offering critique toward future improvements in ability. I offer these critiques because overly complex design is my own bugaboo haha! For example here is a leaded glass window I designed a built many years ago, with my own analysis of the 15 Properties, which includes the thought that it lacks 'Simplicity and Inner Calm'. Best wishes!
Deletehttp://demetriusgonzalez.com/architecture/thesis/thesis.ovalwindow.html
I do see value in your comments, and I must say, the property of 'Simplicity and Inner Calm' seems to be probably hardest to achieve with multiple design elements at play. Prof. Nikos Salingaros once mentioned in one of our Nature of Order webinars - that certain actions increase the 'temparature' and certain actions 'harmonize' a design. I believe, in our attempt to improve a design, we tend to make design moves that increase the temparature more often than ones that harmonize, and moreover, it has acceptability among our clients too. It may be an effect of the System B world we live in. On another note, may I know your name? I see you as 'Anonymous', perhaps because you aren't using a Google account.
Delete